Woman's Masterpiece, The: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


"The only evidence for the existence of a play of this name is Marriott's entry of the play in the Stationers' Register" (Bentley, 5.1447).
"The only evidence for the existence of a play of this name is Marriott's entry of the play in the Stationers' Register" (Bentley, 5.1447). Harbage, ("Elizabethan-Restoration palimpsest", 309), guesses (rather randomly) that the play could have been by Brome, as the title sounds not unlike his.
 


==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==

Revision as of 11:28, 14 April 2010

Anon. (1653)


Historical Records

Entered on Marriott's List (1653):

The Womans Master Peice


Theatrical Provenance

Unknown


Probable Genre(s)

Unknown


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

None known


References to the Play

None known


Critical Commentary

"The only evidence for the existence of a play of this name is Marriott's entry of the play in the Stationers' Register" (Bentley, 5.1447). Harbage, ("Elizabethan-Restoration palimpsest", 309), guesses (rather randomly) that the play could have been by Brome, as the title sounds not unlike his.

For What It's Worth

For discussion of Marriott's list, follow this link: Marriott's List (1653)


Site created and maintained by Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam University; updated 11 January 2010.