Warlamchester: Difference between revisions

 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 53: Line 53:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The use of the Saxon name in the play's title suggests that its subject matter is derived from the period prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. One obvious possibility is the martyrdom of St Alban, referred to in the first volume of&nbsp;Holinshed's ''Chronicles'' (1577), in the chapter entitled "Asclepiodotus duke of Cornewall" ([http://www.english.ox.ac.uk/holinshed/texts.php?text1=1577_0160 Oxford Holinshed Project, p. 88)]).
The use of the Saxon name in the play's title suggests that its subject matter is derived from the period prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. One obvious possibility is the martyrdom of St Alban, referred to in the first volume of&nbsp;[[WorksCited|Holinshed]]'s ''Chronicles'' (1577), in the chapter entitled "Asclepiodotus duke of Cornewall" ([http://www.english.ox.ac.uk/holinshed/texts.php?text1=1577_0160 Oxford Holinshed Project, p. 88)]).
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The other obvious possibility is the earlier destruction of Verulamium during the revolt of Boudicea, referred to in the first volume of Holinshed's ''Chronicles'' (1577), in the chapter entitled "Aruiragus" ([http://www.english.ox.ac.uk/holinshed/texts.php?text1=1577_0155 Oxford Holinshed Project, p. 64]).
The other obvious possibility is the earlier destruction of Verulamium during the revolt of Boudicea, referred to in the first volume of [[WorksCited|Holinshed]]'s ''Chronicles'' (1577), in the chapter entitled "Aruiragus" ([http://www.english.ox.ac.uk/holinshed/texts.php?text1=1577_0155 Oxford Holinshed Project, p. 64]).
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 65: Line 65:


==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==
<br>
 
[[WorksCited|Malone]], who enters the play by the date of 30 November, makes no comment on the play (p. 296); [[WorksCited|Collier]] points out only that the play is neither new nor the same as "The Wise Man of West Chester" (p 45, n. 4). [[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']], without comment, enters the name of the play as "Warlam Chester" (2.#139, p. 301). [[WorksCited|Greg II]], citing Hazlitt's title choice of "Wars of Lancaster," rejects it both because "that play" (i.e., Shakespeare's "Contention") "never belonged to the Admiral's men" and "such a miswriting is impossible" (#61, p. 172).
[[WorksCited|Malone]], who enters the play by the date of 30 November, makes no comment on the play (p. 296); [[WorksCited|Collier]] points out only that the play is neither new nor the same as "The Wise Man of West Chester" (p 45, n. 4). [[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']], without comment, enters the name of the play as "Warlam Chester" (2.#139, p. 301). [[WorksCited|Greg II]], citing Hazlitt's title choice of "Wars of Lancaster," rejects it both because "that play" (i.e., Shakespeare's "Contention") "never belonged to the Admiral's men" and "such a miswriting is impossible" (#61, p. 172).


Line 82: Line 82:
<br><br>
<br><br>
[[category:all]][[category:English history]]
[[category:all]][[category:English history]]
Site created and maintained by [[category:Tom Rutter|Tom Rutter]]Tom Rutter, University of Sheffield Hallam; updated 22 April 2010.[[category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Saints]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Rose]][[category:Holinshed]][[category:Update]][[category:Plays]]
Site created and maintained by [[category:Tom Rutter|Tom Rutter]]Tom Rutter, University of Sheffield Hallam; updated 22 April 2010.[[category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Saints]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Rose]][[category:Holinshed]][[category:Update]][[category:Plays]][[category:English history]][[category:Pseudo-history]]

Latest revision as of 13:38, 4 October 2022

Anon. (>1594)


Historical Records

Performance Records

Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary


Fol. 10v (Greg. I.20)

ye 28 of novmber 1594 ………. Res at warlamchester ………. xxiijs
ye 30 of novmber 1594 ………. Res at warlamchester ………. xxxviijs
ye 12 of desember 1594 ………. Res at warlamchester ………. xvs


Fol. 11v (Greg. I.22)

ye 29 of aprell 1595 ………. Res at warlamchester ………. xxixs
ye 10 of maye 1595 ………. Res at warlam chester ………. xxixs


Fol. 12v (Greg. I.24)

ye 30 of maye 1595 ………. Res at warlamchester ………. ixs
ye 16 of June 1595 ………. Res at warlamchester ………. xxvs



Theatrical Provenance

Admiral's Men at the Rose. The play is not marked with Henslowe's enigmatic "ne," so it is possible that "Warlamchester" had been performed before its debut at the Rose.

Probable Genre(s)

Saint's life? Anglo-Roman history?

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues


Warlamchester (one of numerous variant historical spellings) was the Saxon name of the settlement previously known by the Romans as Verulamium. It subsequently came to be called St Albans in memory of the martyr executed there in the third century.

The use of the Saxon name in the play's title suggests that its subject matter is derived from the period prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. One obvious possibility is the martyrdom of St Alban, referred to in the first volume of Holinshed's Chronicles (1577), in the chapter entitled "Asclepiodotus duke of Cornewall" (Oxford Holinshed Project, p. 88)).

The other obvious possibility is the earlier destruction of Verulamium during the revolt of Boudicea, referred to in the first volume of Holinshed's Chronicles (1577), in the chapter entitled "Aruiragus" (Oxford Holinshed Project, p. 64).

References to the Play


Information welcome.

Critical Commentary

Malone, who enters the play by the date of 30 November, makes no comment on the play (p. 296); Collier points out only that the play is neither new nor the same as "The Wise Man of West Chester" (p 45, n. 4). Fleay, BCED, without comment, enters the name of the play as "Warlam Chester" (2.#139, p. 301). Greg II, citing Hazlitt's title choice of "Wars of Lancaster," rejects it both because "that play" (i.e., Shakespeare's "Contention") "never belonged to the Admiral's men" and "such a miswriting is impossible" (#61, p. 172).

Wiggins, Catalogue #860 focuses on the location of St. Albans and leans toward "the town itself [as] the play's leading 'character' . He leans away from "either the Roman destruction of Verulamium ... or the martyrdom of St Alban [because] neither would explain the use of the anachronistic name" (3.46).

For What It's Worth

Sally-Beth MacLean provides a civic and commercial context for plays in the West of England during the medieval period that featured saints. She argues that the most popular saints culturally were St. Nicholas and St. George, yet this popularity is not reflected in surviving evidence of plays featuring either one. Rather, the subject of the most saints' plays that survive in this area of England is "female martyr saints" (p. 51). According to MacLean, "Shrewsbury, home of an important shrine to a female virgin saint, is a likely urban centre for production of saint plays such as the two on record" (p.51). One of these featured Saints Feliciana and Sabina; the other featured St. Katherine of Alexandria (p. 55).


Works Cited

MacLean, Sally-Beth. "Saints on Stage: An Analytical Survey of Dramatic Records in the West of England." Early Theatre 2 (1999): 45-62.



Site created and maintained byTom Rutter, University of Sheffield Hallam; updated 22 April 2010.