Robert II, King of Scots (The Scot's Tragedy): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 55: Line 55:
| the scottes tragedie the some of …||}
| the scottes tragedie the some of …||}
|}
|}
<br><br><br>
 
<br><br>


==Theatrical Provenance==
==Theatrical Provenance==
Line 64: Line 65:


==Probable Genre(s)==
==Probable Genre(s)==
<br>
History (Harbage); Tragedy (Henslowe)


<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>
<br><br>
 
 


==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>
Holinshed (Shapiro)
 
 


==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==


<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
None known.




Line 83: Line 82:
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
Shapiro
 
<br><br>
 


==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
The fact that the King's men acquired a play called "[[Gowrie]]" in 1604, when the politics of the Stuarts were also controversial, suggests that the theatrical world was not completely risk averse when it came to issues of succession and royal legitimacy.
 
<br><br>
[[category:all]][[category:"other Jentellman"]]
[[category:all]][[category:"other Jentellman"]]


Line 97: Line 95:
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==


<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu.>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Shapiro, James. "The Scot's Tragedy ''and the Politics of Popular Drama''." ''English Literary Renaissance'' 23 (1993): 428-49.</div>
<br>
<br>
<br>


[[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]]
[[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:Holinshed]][[category:History]][[category:Political]]
Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 30 October 2009.
Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 29 February 2016.

Revision as of 18:08, 29 February 2016

Henry Chettle, Thomas Dekker, Ben Jonson, "other Jentellman" (1599)


Historical Records

Payments for Playwrights (Henslowe's Diary)


F. 64 (Greg, I. 111)

Lent vnto Thomas downton the 3 of Septmber }
1599 to lend vnto Thomas deckers Bengemen }
Johnson hary chettell & other Jentellman in earneste } xxxxs
of a playe calle Robart the second Kinge of scottes }
tragedie the some of … }
Lent vnto Samwell Rowley & Robart shawe }
the 15 of septmber 1599 to lend in earneste of a }
Boocke called the scottes ragedti vnto Thomas } xxs
dickers & harey chettell the some of … }
Lent hary chettell the 16 of septmber 1599 }
in earneste of a Boocke called the scottes } xs
tragedie the some of … }



F. 64v (Greg, I.112)

Lent into wm Borne the 27 of }
Setmber 1599 to lend vnto Bengemen }
Johnsone in earneste of a Boocke called } xxs
the scottes tragedie the some of … }



Theatrical Provenance


The Admiral's men made four payments "in earneste" for the play in September 1599 apparently for performance at the Rose playhouse. No payments for apparel or divers things confirms that the play was brought into production.

Probable Genre(s)


History (Harbage); Tragedy (Henslowe)



Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

Holinshed (Shapiro)

References to the Play

None known.


Critical Commentary

Shapiro

For What It's Worth

The fact that the King's men acquired a play called "Gowrie" in 1604, when the politics of the Stuarts were also controversial, suggests that the theatrical world was not completely risk averse when it came to issues of succession and royal legitimacy.


Works Cited

Shapiro, James. "The Scot's Tragedy and the Politics of Popular Drama." English Literary Renaissance 23 (1993): 428-49.


Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 29 February 2016.