Difference between revisions of "Pythagoras"

Line 1: Line 1:
=== '''Performance Records (Henslowe’s Diary)'''
+
== === '''Performance Records (Henslowe’s Diary)'''
 +
==
 
  ===
 
  ===
 
F.14 (Greg I.27)
 
F.14 (Greg I.27)
  
16 of Jenewary 1595  ne––Rd at pethageros . . . iij li j s
+
16 of Jenewary 1595  ne––Rd at pethageros . . . iij <sup>li</sup> j <sup>s</sup>
  
F.14v
+
F.14v (Greg I.28)
  
23 of Jenewary 1595 Rd at pethagorus . . .  xxxvj s
+
23 of Jenewary 1595 Rd at pethagorus . . .  xxxvj <sup>s</sup>
  
28 of Jenewary 1595` Rd at pethagoros . . . xxx s
+
28 of Jenewary 1595` Rd at pethagoros . . . xxx <sup>s</sup>
  
9 of Febreary 1595 Rd at pethagores . . . xx s
+
9 of Febreary 1595 Rd at pethagores . . . xx <sup>s</sup>
  
15 of Febreary 1595 Rd at pethagores . . . xxxv s
+
15 of Febreary 1595 Rd at pethagores . . . xxxv <sup>s</sup>
  
23 of Febreary 1595 shroft tewsday  Rd at pethagores  xxxiiij s
+
23 of Febreary 1595 shroft tewsday  Rd at pethagores  xxxiiij <sup>s</sup>
  
F.15v
+
F.15v (I.30)
  
21 of aprell 1596 Rd at pethagorus . . . xviij s
+
21 of aprell 1596 Rd at pethagorus . . . xviij <sup>s</sup>
  
4 of maye 1596 Rd at pethagorus . . . xx s
+
4 of maye 1596 Rd at pethagorus . . . xx <sup>s</sup>
  
22 of maye 1596 mr pd  Rd at pethagoros . . . xxvij s
+
22 of maye 1596 mr pd  Rd at pethagoros . . . xxvij <sup>s</sup>
  
F.21v
+
F.21v (I.42)
  
31 of maye whittsenmvnday Rd at pethagores . . . iij li
+
31 of maye whittsenmvnday Rd at pethagores . . . iij <sup>li</sup>
  
15 of June 1596 Rd at pethagores . . . xxiij s
+
15 of June 1596 Rd at pethagores . . . xxiij <sup>s</sup>
  
 
On July 1st, 1596 Henslowe entered the takings from a new play. It appears that he began to write pethagores, but crossed it out and wrote "paradox" instead.  
 
On July 1st, 1596 Henslowe entered the takings from a new play. It appears that he began to write pethagores, but crossed it out and wrote "paradox" instead.  
  
1 of Ju[n]ley 1596 ne––Rd at [peth] paradox ... xxxxv s
+
1 of Ju[n]ley 1596 ne––Rd at [peth] paradox ... xxxxv <sup>s</sup>
  
1[3]4 of July 1596 Rd at pethagores . . . xxij s
+
1[3]4 of July 1596 Rd at pethagores . . . xxij <sup>s</sup>
 
===  
 
===  
 
Henslowe Papers ===
 
Henslowe Papers ===
Line 44: Line 45:
  
 
Pethagores
 
Pethagores
===  
+
== ===  
 
Probable Genre(s) ===
 
Probable Genre(s) ===
 +
==
 +
Since the play presumably centers on the Ancient Greek philosopher Pythagoras, it could perhaps fall under the category of Classical History. Harbage offers the tentative suggestion "Classical Biography(?)" in his Annals of English Drama (64-65). Pythagoras, however, was a magnet for colorful legends and apocryphal tales and his earliest biographies did not appear until several centuries after his death. So the label “Classical Biography” may give a misleading impression of historical accuracy. It is noteworthy that Pythagoras premiered at a time when the Admiral's repertoire featured a number of conjuror-and-devil plays (and in the midst of a successful run of "Wise Men of West Chester"). So the lost play may have been a magus play in the tradition of Faustus (who mentions Pythagoras in his final soliloquy).
 +
==
 +
Possible Narrative or Dramatic Sources or Analogues ==
 +
 +
Most educated Elizabethans would have been familiar with Pythagoras from his lengthy oration in Book 15 of Ovid’s Metamorphosis--––one of the most popular sourcebooks for Renaissance dramatists.
 +
 +
:Heere dwelt a man of Samos Ile, who for the hate he had
 +
To Lordlynesse and Tyranny, though unconstreyned was glad
 +
To make himself a bannisht man.
 +
(15.66-68)
 +
 +
Ovid’s account, however, is rather skimpy in terms of biographical detail. He mentions Pythagoras’s quarrel with the tyrant Polycrates, his subsequent exile and settlement in Croton, and his (historically impossible) advising of King Numa. Perhaps these could have furnished a crude outline for the narrative. But the bulk of the speech is a redaction of key tenets of Pythagoras’s moral and natural philosophy: vegetarianism, the transmigration of the soul (metempsychosis), the nature of the four elements, and mutability (the paradox of constant change). Philosophy lectures do not, as a rule, make for gripping drama on stage. So Ovid may merely have imparted a basic knowledge of Pythagorean doctrine, which the playwright(s) could have spun out into any number of conceivable plots.
 +
 +
The comic dialogues of the Roman satirist Lucian could also have inspired the author(s) of the lost play. In “Philosophies for Sale,” Zeus and Hermes auction off philosophers---–including Pythagoras------––in a parody of an Athenian slave-market. Lucian’s works were available in Latin in Elizabethan London; Marlowe’s celebrated line about Helen of Troy’s face is a paraphrase of a macabre query in Lucian’s Dialogues of the Dead.
 +
 +
Although a few terse anecdotes about Pythagoras and his followers appear in scattered sources such as Plato and Herodotus, much of our knowledge of this enigmatic sage derives from the third-century CE biographies of Diogenes Laertius and Iamblichus. A Latin translation of Diogenes Laertitus’ Lives of the Eminent Philosophers was published in Geneva in 1570 and reissued in 1585. A parallel Greek-Latin version of Iamblichus’ biography appeared in Paris 1598 (two years after the lost play premiered).
 +
 +
Perhaps the most detailed vita of Pythagoras in Elizabethan English is the entry in Thomas Cooper’s Thesaurus linguae Romanae & Britannicae tam accurate congestus (1578)--––a popular reference work in Tudor England.
 +
:
 +
A man of excellent witte, borne in an yle called Samos, which countrey being subdued by the tyranne of Polycrates, he forsooke and went into Aegipt and Babilonia, to learne mysticall sciences, and afterwarde came into Italy, where he continued the rest of his lyfe. Hee was the first that named himself Philosopher, where before men of great learning were called wyse men: and bycause he woulde eschewe the note of arrogancie, when one demaunded of hyme what hee was, hee sayde, Philosophus, whiche signifyeth a louer of wysedome. He was in sharpnesse of wit passing al other and found the subtile conclusions and misteries of Arithmetike, (Image 861) Musike, and Geometrie. Plato wondreth at his wisedome: his doctrine was diuine and compendious: the which he teachynge to other[s], enioyned them to keepe silence fiue yeares, and heare him diligentlye, ere they demaunded of him any question. He neuer would do sacrifice with any bloud, he woulde eate nothing that had lyfe, and lyued in a marueylous abstinence, and continence, and was in such authortie among hys disciples, that when in disputation they maintained their opinion, if on demaunded of them, why it should bee as they spake, they would aunswere onely, Ipse dixit, he sayde so, meaning Pythagoras: which aunswere was reputed as sufficient, as if it had been prooued with an ineuitable reason: so much in estimation was he for his approoued truth an incomparable learning. He was noted to be expert in magyke: and therefore it is written of him, that nigh to the citie of Tarentum, he behlde an Oxe byting the toppes of beanes there growing, and treading them down with his feete: wherefore he bade the heardman to aduise his Oxe that he should absteyne from graine: the heardman laughing at him, sayde, that he neuer learned to speake as an Oxe: but thou (sayde he) that seemest to haue experience therin, take myne office upon thee. Foorthwith Pythagoras went to the Oxe, and laying his mouth to his eare, whistered somewhat of his Arte. A marueylous thing, the Oxe, as if he had beene taught left eating of the corne, nor neuer after touched any: but many yeares after mildely walked in the citie, and tooke his meate onely of them that woulde gyue it him. Many lyke wonderfull things are written of him. Finally his disciples, for their wysedome and temperance, were always had in great estimation. He was before the incarnation of Christ. 522 yeares. (Ooooooo.Ii r-v)
 +
 +
Pythagoras did enjoy some notoriety on the Elizabethan stage prior to 1596. Famously, in Doctor Faustus the eponymous conjuror wishes his soul could transmigrate into an animal’s body rather than suffer eternal damnation. Given the popularity of Marlowe’s play in the Admiral’s repertoire, it is possible that this moment in Faustus supplied an impetus for the lost play.
 +
 +
Other references to Pythagoras occur in Greene’s Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (c. 1590), Thomas Nashe’s Summer’s Last Will and Testament (c. 1593), and (as elucidated below) in several plays by Shakespeare composed shortly after the lost play premiered at the Rose. Pythagoras himself actually appears on stage in Lyly’s Endymion (c.1591)--––in which retracts his heretical teachings and defers to the wisdom of Cynthia--, a stand-in for Queen Elizabeth. Cumulatively, these allusions all associate Pythagoras with occult magic, raising the odds the lost play would have trafficked in magical spectacle.
 +
 +
One other possible analogue must also be mentioned. In his History of Rome, Livy tells of a heroic Spartan captain named Pythagoras who defends the town of Argos against a Roman siege. Given the rash of jokes about metempsychosis in Elizabethan drama after 1596 (see below), however, it seems far more likely that the lost play dealt with the exploits of the notorious Greek philosopher rather than an obscure Spartan soldier.
  
Since the play presumably centers on the Ancient Greek philosopher Pythagoras, it could perhaps fall under the category of Classical History. Harbage offers the tentative suggestion "Classical Biography(?)" in his Annals of English Drama (64-65). Pythagoras, however, was a magnet for colorful legends and apocryphal tales and his earliest biographies did not appear until several centuries after his death. So the label “Classical Biography” may give a misleading impression of historical accuracy. Since Pythagoras premiered at a time when the Admiral's repertoire featured a number of conjuror-and-devil plays and in the midst of a successful run of "Wise Men of West Chester" the play may have been a magus play in the tradition of Faustus.
+
References to the Play

Revision as of 14:54, 24 September 2013

== === Performance Records (Henslowe’s Diary)

==
===

F.14 (Greg I.27)

16 of Jenewary 1595 ne––Rd at pethageros . . . iij li j s

F.14v (Greg I.28)

23 of Jenewary 1595 Rd at pethagorus . . . xxxvj s

28 of Jenewary 1595` Rd at pethagoros . . . xxx s

9 of Febreary 1595 Rd at pethagores . . . xx s

15 of Febreary 1595 Rd at pethagores . . . xxxv s

23 of Febreary 1595 shroft tewsday Rd at pethagores xxxiiij s

F.15v (I.30)

21 of aprell 1596 Rd at pethagorus . . . xviij s

4 of maye 1596 Rd at pethagorus . . . xx s

22 of maye 1596 mr pd Rd at pethagoros . . . xxvij s

F.21v (I.42)

31 of maye whittsenmvnday Rd at pethagores . . . iij li

15 of June 1596 Rd at pethagores . . . xxiij s

On July 1st, 1596 Henslowe entered the takings from a new play. It appears that he began to write pethagores, but crossed it out and wrote "paradox" instead.

1 of Ju[n]ley 1596 ne––Rd at [peth] paradox ... xxxxv s

1[3]4 of July 1596 Rd at pethagores . . . xxij s

=

Henslowe Papers ===

Another reference to this lost play occurs in a company inventory, transcribed and published by Malone and reprinted by Greg in Henslowe Papers (121)

“A Note of all bookes as belong to the Stocke, and such as I have bought since the 3d of March 1598.”

Pethagores

=

Probable Genre(s) ===

==

Since the play presumably centers on the Ancient Greek philosopher Pythagoras, it could perhaps fall under the category of Classical History. Harbage offers the tentative suggestion "Classical Biography(?)" in his Annals of English Drama (64-65). Pythagoras, however, was a magnet for colorful legends and apocryphal tales and his earliest biographies did not appear until several centuries after his death. So the label “Classical Biography” may give a misleading impression of historical accuracy. It is noteworthy that Pythagoras premiered at a time when the Admiral's repertoire featured a number of conjuror-and-devil plays (and in the midst of a successful run of "Wise Men of West Chester"). So the lost play may have been a magus play in the tradition of Faustus (who mentions Pythagoras in his final soliloquy). == Possible Narrative or Dramatic Sources or Analogues ==

Most educated Elizabethans would have been familiar with Pythagoras from his lengthy oration in Book 15 of Ovid’s Metamorphosis--––one of the most popular sourcebooks for Renaissance dramatists.

Heere dwelt a man of Samos Ile, who for the hate he had

To Lordlynesse and Tyranny, though unconstreyned was glad To make himself a bannisht man. (15.66-68)

Ovid’s account, however, is rather skimpy in terms of biographical detail. He mentions Pythagoras’s quarrel with the tyrant Polycrates, his subsequent exile and settlement in Croton, and his (historically impossible) advising of King Numa. Perhaps these could have furnished a crude outline for the narrative. But the bulk of the speech is a redaction of key tenets of Pythagoras’s moral and natural philosophy: vegetarianism, the transmigration of the soul (metempsychosis), the nature of the four elements, and mutability (the paradox of constant change). Philosophy lectures do not, as a rule, make for gripping drama on stage. So Ovid may merely have imparted a basic knowledge of Pythagorean doctrine, which the playwright(s) could have spun out into any number of conceivable plots.

The comic dialogues of the Roman satirist Lucian could also have inspired the author(s) of the lost play. In “Philosophies for Sale,” Zeus and Hermes auction off philosophers---–including Pythagoras------––in a parody of an Athenian slave-market. Lucian’s works were available in Latin in Elizabethan London; Marlowe’s celebrated line about Helen of Troy’s face is a paraphrase of a macabre query in Lucian’s Dialogues of the Dead.

Although a few terse anecdotes about Pythagoras and his followers appear in scattered sources such as Plato and Herodotus, much of our knowledge of this enigmatic sage derives from the third-century CE biographies of Diogenes Laertius and Iamblichus. A Latin translation of Diogenes Laertitus’ Lives of the Eminent Philosophers was published in Geneva in 1570 and reissued in 1585. A parallel Greek-Latin version of Iamblichus’ biography appeared in Paris 1598 (two years after the lost play premiered).

Perhaps the most detailed vita of Pythagoras in Elizabethan English is the entry in Thomas Cooper’s Thesaurus linguae Romanae & Britannicae tam accurate congestus (1578)--––a popular reference work in Tudor England.

A man of excellent witte, borne in an yle called Samos, which countrey being subdued by the tyranne of Polycrates, he forsooke and went into Aegipt and Babilonia, to learne mysticall sciences, and afterwarde came into Italy, where he continued the rest of his lyfe. Hee was the first that named himself Philosopher, where before men of great learning were called wyse men: and bycause he woulde eschewe the note of arrogancie, when one demaunded of hyme what hee was, hee sayde, Philosophus, whiche signifyeth a louer of wysedome. He was in sharpnesse of wit passing al other and found the subtile conclusions and misteries of Arithmetike, (Image 861) Musike, and Geometrie. Plato wondreth at his wisedome: his doctrine was diuine and compendious: the which he teachynge to other[s], enioyned them to keepe silence fiue yeares, and heare him diligentlye, ere they demaunded of him any question. He neuer would do sacrifice with any bloud, he woulde eate nothing that had lyfe, and lyued in a marueylous abstinence, and continence, and was in such authortie among hys disciples, that when in disputation they maintained their opinion, if on demaunded of them, why it should bee as they spake, they would aunswere onely, Ipse dixit, he sayde so, meaning Pythagoras: which aunswere was reputed as sufficient, as if it had been prooued with an ineuitable reason: so much in estimation was he for his approoued truth an incomparable learning. He was noted to be expert in magyke: and therefore it is written of him, that nigh to the citie of Tarentum, he behlde an Oxe byting the toppes of beanes there growing, and treading them down with his feete: wherefore he bade the heardman to aduise his Oxe that he should absteyne from graine: the heardman laughing at him, sayde, that he neuer learned to speake as an Oxe: but thou (sayde he) that seemest to haue experience therin, take myne office upon thee. Foorthwith Pythagoras went to the Oxe, and laying his mouth to his eare, whistered somewhat of his Arte. A marueylous thing, the Oxe, as if he had beene taught left eating of the corne, nor neuer after touched any: but many yeares after mildely walked in the citie, and tooke his meate onely of them that woulde gyue it him. Many lyke wonderfull things are written of him. Finally his disciples, for their wysedome and temperance, were always had in great estimation. He was before the incarnation of Christ. 522 yeares. (Ooooooo.Ii r-v)

Pythagoras did enjoy some notoriety on the Elizabethan stage prior to 1596. Famously, in Doctor Faustus the eponymous conjuror wishes his soul could transmigrate into an animal’s body rather than suffer eternal damnation. Given the popularity of Marlowe’s play in the Admiral’s repertoire, it is possible that this moment in Faustus supplied an impetus for the lost play.

Other references to Pythagoras occur in Greene’s Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (c. 1590), Thomas Nashe’s Summer’s Last Will and Testament (c. 1593), and (as elucidated below) in several plays by Shakespeare composed shortly after the lost play premiered at the Rose. Pythagoras himself actually appears on stage in Lyly’s Endymion (c.1591)--––in which retracts his heretical teachings and defers to the wisdom of Cynthia--, a stand-in for Queen Elizabeth. Cumulatively, these allusions all associate Pythagoras with occult magic, raising the odds the lost play would have trafficked in magical spectacle.

One other possible analogue must also be mentioned. In his History of Rome, Livy tells of a heroic Spartan captain named Pythagoras who defends the town of Argos against a Roman siege. Given the rash of jokes about metempsychosis in Elizabethan drama after 1596 (see below), however, it seems far more likely that the lost play dealt with the exploits of the notorious Greek philosopher rather than an obscure Spartan soldier.

References to the Play