Pope Joan: Difference between revisions

Line 35: Line 35:
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>
Wiggins points out that a possible source on Pope Joan by John Mayo had been published in 1591 (#894). That book, ''The Pope's Parliament,''
 
 


==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==

Revision as of 11:45, 2 November 2018

Anon. (1592)


Historical Records

Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)


A single record of performance survives in Henslowe’s accounts for early 1592 (new style):

Fol. 7/ Greg I, 13

.9.………. Res at poope Jone the 1 of marche 1591 ………. ………. xvs




Theatrical Provenance

Henslowe's Diary reports that Lord Strange's men performed this play at the Rose Theatre on March 1, 1591/92. Since Henslowe does not mark it as a new play, "Pope Joan" had evidently been performed earlier, but no record of such performances has survived.


Probable Genre(s)

foreign pseudo-history (Harbage); history (Wiggins)


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

Wiggins points out that a possible source on Pope Joan by John Mayo had been published in 1591 (#894). That book, The Pope's Parliament,

References to the Play

<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>


Critical Commentary

Wiggins considers this play to belong to his category of old plays in the repertory of Strange's men that were nearing the end of their runs when Henslowe began to keep records (see Wiggins, both #894 [for "Pope Joan" specifically] and #878 [for his argument about the repertorial age of non-"ne" plays in Strange's 1592 repertory]).

Manley and Maclean speculate that the play, given its implied anti-Catholic subject matter, might previously have belonged to the "more staunchly Protestant repertory of Leicester's Men" (31, 146). At least three players in the company of Strange's men had formerly been members of Leicester's men: George Bryan, Will Kempe, and Thomas Pope.

For What It's Worth



Works Cited

<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>

citation goes here

<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play.Follow the examples below to make category tags.>


Site created and maintained by Craig M. Rustici, Hofstra University; updated 24 August 2016.