Pierce of Exton: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "Thomas Dekker, Michael Drayton, Henry Chettle and Robert Wilson (1598) ==Historical Records== ===Payments to Playwrights (''Henslowe's Diary'')=== <br> '''...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
<br>
<br>
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==
<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>


<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>
 
<br>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>
<br>
 
<br>
 
Site created and maintained by [[David McInnis]], University of Melbourne; updated 18 March 2015.
Site created and maintained by [[David McInnis]], University of Melbourne; updated 18 March 2015.
[[category:all]][[category:David McInnis]][[category:English history]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Rose]][[category:Henslowe's records]][[category:partial payment]]
[[category:all]][[category:David McInnis]][[category:English history]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Rose]][[category:Henslowe's records]][[category:partial payment]]

Revision as of 23:29, 17 March 2015

Thomas Dekker, Michael Drayton, Henry Chettle and Robert Wilson (1598)


Historical Records

Payments to Playwrights (Henslowe's Diary)


F.45 (Greg I.85)

Lent vnto the company to geue mr willsone dickers }
drayton & cheatell in pte of payment of a boocke } xxxxs
called perce of extone the some of . . . . . . . . }




Theatrical Provenance

If it were performed, it would have been by the Admiral's at the Rose in the Spring of 1598. The partial payment of 2 pounds, and the absence of this title in the inventory list of playbooks subsequently drafted by Henslowe, casts some doubt over whether "Pierce of Exton" was completed. It may well have been, and the playwrights may have been paid the balance owed to them by the company rather than by Henslowe.


Probable Genre(s)

History (Harbage).


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

As Wiggins notes, the central protagonist's identity is relatively clear, but what aspect of his life the dramatists chose to depict is ambiguous:

The central incident was presumably the one for which the title character was known: his murder of King Richard II, seemingly at the instigation of King Henry IV. But this alone would not provide enough incident to be the basis of a play. The key, unknowable issue is whether the murder was the plot's climax, fulcrum, or initiating event: the play might have presented his crime as the eventual outcome of a scapegrace's life; it might have taken a cue from the Tudor chroniclers' emphasis on his remorse after the event, and presented his tormented wanderings abroad after his rejection and banishment by Henry IV, the beneficiary of the murder; or it might have done both. (1118)



References to the Play

Information welcome.


Critical Commentary

<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>


For What It's Worth

Information welcome.


Works Cited

citation goes here




Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 18 March 2015.