Difference between revisions of "Phocasse (Focas)"
|Line 66:||Line 66:|
==== Philip Henslowe's papers in the Dulwich College Library ====
==== Philip Henslowe's papers in the Dulwich College Library ====
=====List of playbooks=====
=====List of playbooks=====
Revision as of 14:49, 11 August 2022
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 15v (Greg 1.30):
ye 19 of maye 1596 . . . . . ne . . Res at tragedie of ffocasse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxxvs ye 23 of maye 1596 Res at tragedie of ffocasse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxixs
Fol. 21v (Greg 1.42)
ye 4 of June 1596 Res at the tragedie of focas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxjs ye 16 of June 1596 Res at ffocase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxs ye 22 of June 1596 Res at focas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ls ye 5 of July 1596 —mr pd— Res at focasse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxijs ye 17 of July 1596 Res at focas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxixs
Purchase of playbooks from Martin Slater in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 45v (Greg 1.86:)
Lente vnto the company the 16 of maye 1598 to buye } v boocks of martine slather called ij ptes of hercolus } vijll & focas & pethagoras & elyxander & lodicke wch laste } boock he hath not yet delyuerd the some of . . . . . . . . . . }
Philip Henslowe's papers in the Dulwich College Library
List of playbooks
- A Note of all suche bookes as belong to the Stocke, and such as I have bought since the 3d of March 1598
Introduced as a new play at the Rose by the Admiral's men in the same run which saw "Julian the Apostate" and "Tamar Cham" (or "Tambercame") marked "ne." It received 7 performances. Martin Slater was paid £7 on behalf of the Admiral's men for this and 4 other books ("Pythagoras", "Alexander and Lodowick", and the two parts of "Hercules") on the 16 of May 1598, which suggests (as Chambers notes) that he had retained ownership of these plays when he left the company (2.167).
Classical history (Harbage).
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
From Rainolde fol.165 (EEBO).
Greg II observes that "Phocas, a centurion, was elected Emperor of Constantinople in 606, and was deposed and killed by Heraclius in 610" (#91, p.180).
Phocas is often mentioned in early modern texts, where he is famed for obtaining power by the treacherous murder of Mauritius and family, and retaining power by installing Bishop Boniface III as Pope. Here's one of the more succinct summaries of the Emperor's barbarous ways --- a chronicle of Roman Emperors, by Richard Rainolde, in which the marginal note simply designates Phocas "a tyrant":
- Phocas a base Centurion and a Thracian in ye seditious vprore was created an Emperour. He murtheringe his maister and kinge Mauritius of whom he was brought vp, this Phocas gouerned vii. yeares, he was Crowned at Constantinople of the patriarcke Ciriacus. Assone as Mauritius was slaine, immediatly he exercised crueltye against his frends: After he was placed in the Emperial seate without all nobility, as by bloudye practises he obtayned the same, so he exercised himselfe to the destruction of the Romaines with all crueltye tormenting them, geuen ouer to all abhomination. He toke awaye other mens wyues from their husbands: he made much of wicked persons: He wasted the Romayne Empyre of their riches and treasures: he liued at Rome in all beastly dronkennes, and suffered the Romaine Empyre to be spoyled of the Persians, of the Hunnes, and of Caganus kinge of Hungarye who~ I spake of before. The wrathe of God fell vpon this murtherer, and all that hoast & power of men which was ye ouerthrow of Mauritius and priuye to his death. For Cosroes in .ii. great battailes made slaughter of the Romaynes infinitlye, and ye rest he ledde away captiues. This Cosroes wanne from the Romaynes Hierusalem, and murthered there a greate nomber of Christia~s, he possessed the Dominion of Cyria & destroyed manye Princes.
- Phocas thorow his ill life came in hatred, not onlye of the Romaynes, but also of al other Princes: ye murther of Mauritius committed by Phocas was not forgotten. Priscus who in the time of Mauritius was one of his chiefe Captaynes, & also a Duke & sonne in law to Phocas: also Heraclius Preside~t in Affrica whose wyfe Phocas had taken away, all these conspyred against Phocas to destroy him. This was ye effect of their purpose, that at one time Priscus shoulde bringe his hoast of Thracians to Consta~tinople, & Heraclius his hoast out of Affrica to Consta~tinople also, Photius with another part to set vpon Phocas in his Pallace, wher small resista~ce was made, these entring ye Emperours house, toke Phocas & brought him to Heraclius ye sonne of Heracliona who was then generall of the partes in Assyria. Immediatly the men of warre cut of his legges and armes, and cutte of his priuities, and last of all his head. This was the ende of that tyrant, who before murthered the Emperour Mauritius, hys wyfe, his children, his kinsfolke and frendes, and plagued wt all calamyes the Romaynes: God neuer leaueth vnpunished any murther committed, & most of all he scourgeth the bloudye factes of those who seekes to destroy theyr owne king or Prince, and be domesticall vipers to theyr owne countrye. (Fols.165r-v)
Two, more colourful versions of the Phocas story may be worth including here:
Justinus (in a translation by G.W., possibly the playwright George Wilkins) relates that Mauritious "was warned in a dream to beware of Phocas, who was a Centurion, on the Scithian coasts, yet was he by him depriued both of life and empire. He was an example of patience and fortitude, for seeing his wife and sons slaine before his face, hee cryed out saying. Thou art iust O Lord, and thy iudgementes are right, bearing it without shew of impatience. In his time began the name of Turkes, to bee first heard of in Asia, and the Gothes and Angles were turnd to the christian faith" (sig.[Gg4]v). He proceeds to summarize Phocas's reign specifically:
- Phocas captaine of the band, on the borders of Scithia, was chosen Emp. by the damned Army which he led, who quickly forgat Muricius, and was not warned by his destruction to bewar of couetousnes, but in more greedy maner exacted many tributes, and kept golde more closely, with his courtiers who after the Persian maner disposed all thinges for they gaue audience to Ambassadors, sat in iudgement and bestowed Offices, then which things is more wretched and blameable in a chiefe ruler.
- They were his greatest fauorites, who made the greatest hauock of the common people, and he payed the Souldiers very sparingly. He declared the Romaine Bishop, by the sollicitation of Bonifacius the thid, vniersall and chefe Bishop of the world. And by his sloath and negligence, the Empire of Rome lost all strength, consisting onely in a bare title, and it was brought to passe that either the name of an Empire must be laid aside, or else Phocas must die. There was one Priscus Patricius the sonne in law of Heracleonas, a great of the Emperor, his son Heraclius was Popraetor and gouerned Affrique, these three conspired to kill the Emperor, Heracleon who was captain of the Warre, raised an army and brought it into Thracia, vnder colour to resist the Barbarians, and to defend that region. Heraclius came out of Affrique into Constantinople, least his father should be suspected to rbel, and so they met at a set time, and of purpose made a tumult, and while the Paeorian Souldiers ranne to appease it, the ilthy Emp. was by the traitors beheaded in the thirteenth yeare of his raigne. (sig.[Gg4]v-Ii)
Purchase also summarises the key details of the Roman emperor's reign:
- This Cosroes raigned nine and thirtie yeares. Hee held peace with the Romanes whiles Mauritius liued; but when Phocas cruelly and treacherously had slaine him, a world of euils at once assaulted the Empire. The Germanes, Gaules, Italians, Hunnes, and Persians, by their Armies afflicted the publike State; and the Roman Bishop then began to aspire to an vniuersall Soueraignetie, which that Murtherer first entitled him vnto. That Armie which was yet redde with the bloud of Mauritius, by the Persians sword was punished, and died in their owne bloud: who hauing ouerthrowne the Romanes in two battailes, possessed Mesopotamia, Syria, Aegypt, Palaestina, and Phoenicia. He entred Ierusalem, slew and captiued many Christians, and carried thence the Crosse. Against the Iberians, Armenians, Cappadocians, Galatians, Paphlagonians, euen vnto Chalcedon, hee preuailed. Thus did GOD punish that Murtherer, and besides (to pay him in his owne coyne) Priscus, Heraclon, and Heraclius conspired against this Conspirer, and murthered the Murtherer, and hauing cut off his Priuities, and his Head, hurled him into the Sea, and destroyed his Issue. (308)
References to the Play
Malone names Martin Slaughter as the author of the play (p. 298). Collier considers Slaughter to be "perhaps ... oone iof its joint authors" (p. 69). Fleay, BCED notes the sale to the Admiral's men by Slaughter but nonetheless lists the play with anonymous ones (2.301 #146).
Greg II limits his comments to the identification of the title character as "Phocas, a centurion, [who] was elected Emperor of Constantinople in 606, and was deposed and killed by Heraclius in 610" (p. 180 #91).
For What It's Worth
Amongst the epithets commonly applied to Phocas are "murthering traitor" (Bunny 88), "bloudy and cruell tyrant ... who rauished many vertuous matrones" (Bell 187), "an adulterer, murtherer and tyrant" (Valera 34), and simply "wicked Phocas" (Rhodes sig.E).
In a 1595 text, William Covell relates that Phocas was the subject of a prophetic dream, much like those had by Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great:
- But wee shall finde that oftentimes the same is done by persons heroicall, and of great respect; as appeareth by the dreames of Pharaoh, Nabuchadnezzar, & others, especially in great matters, concerning the state of Monarchies & Empires. The same he doth sometime in things particular and of lesse moment, as may bee proued by infinite places of scripture, & other histories. The dreame of the Emperour Mauricius (by reason of the diuine prouidence which may be marked in it) may serue vs for an example, who dreamed that he should be deliuered to a serua~t of his named Phocas, to be slaine: for this cause he sent for the Captaine Philippick to come out of prison, and demanded of him if there were not one named Phocas: the other answered that there was such a one, a centurion, ambitious, and fearefull. Wherevpon the Emperour sayd, alleadging an olde prouerbe to that ende, If he be a coward he is a murderer. This was the same, who after that he had first slaine his wife and children, caused his head to bee cut off: but the recitall of it is memorable, that Maurice seeing his children murdered by Phocas, and that he himselfe must be put to death presently, he spake often in this manner, O Lord thou art iust, and so are all thy workes. In like manner, the dreame of Alexander the Great is also worth the marking... (50-51]
Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 17 Feb 2011.