Lovers' Holiday, The: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "Anon. (Jacobean or Caroline) ==Historical records== The fifth item on '''Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript''' is: :The Lovers holiday or the Beare The forty-...")
 
Line 11: Line 11:
<br><br>
<br><br>


One immediate question is whether these are two records of the same play, or two separate plays each with the title "The Lovers Holiday".  Bentley (5.1367) also observes the possibility that ''The Bear'' may be something different from ''The Lovers Holiday''.  Bentley also observes the potential ambiguity caused by the lack of an apostrophe: "It is impossible to tell how many lovers had a holiday, but one would guess more than one" (5.1366).
One immediate question is whether these are two records of the same play, or two separate plays each with the title "The Lovers Holiday".  Bentley and Harbage both note the possibility that they are one and the same.  Bentley (5.1367) also observes the possibility that ''The Bear'' may be something different from ''The Lovers Holiday''.  Bentley also observes the potential ambiguity caused by the lack of an apostrophe: "It is impossible to tell how many lovers had a holiday, but one would guess more than one" (5.1366).


==Theatrical provenance==
==Theatrical provenance==

Revision as of 10:18, 5 April 2016

Anon. (Jacobean or Caroline)

Historical records

The fifth item on Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript is:

The Lovers holiday or the Beare

The forty-fourth item is

the Lovers holyday



One immediate question is whether these are two records of the same play, or two separate plays each with the title "The Lovers Holiday". Bentley and Harbage both note the possibility that they are one and the same. Bentley (5.1367) also observes the possibility that The Bear may be something different from The Lovers Holiday. Bentley also observes the potential ambiguity caused by the lack of an apostrophe: "It is impossible to tell how many lovers had a holiday, but one would guess more than one" (5.1366).

Theatrical provenance

This play (or plays) are not known except on Hill's List, and therefore cannot be ascribed to a particular company or dated beyond Bentley's usual formula: "The list seems to have been Hill's record of the stock of some bookseller, set down between 1677 and 1703, but it is notable that nearly all the identifiable plays and playwrights of the list are Jacobean or Caroline" (Bentley, V.1283).


Probable Genre(s)

Love comedy

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>


References to the Play

<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>


Critical Commentary

<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>


For What It's Worth

<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>


Works Cited

<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>

citation goes here

<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>


Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.