Knave in Print, or One for Another, A: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 39: Line 39:
Site created and maintained by [[David Nicol]], Dalhousie University; updated 15 July 2010.
Site created and maintained by [[David Nicol]], Dalhousie University; updated 15 July 2010.
[[category:all]] [[category:Humphrey Moseley]]
[[category:all]] [[category:Humphrey Moseley]]
[[category:S.R.]]
[[category:Stationers' Register]]

Latest revision as of 15:32, 10 December 2021

William Rowley, date unknown (1622-5?)


Historical Records

From a long list of plays entered into the Stationers' Register by Humphrey Moseley on 9 September, 1653:

"The Foole without Booke
} by Wm: Rowley
A Knaue in Print, or One for another"

(S.R.2, 1:429; Greg, BEPD, 1:61; Bentley, 5:1022).


Theatrical Provenance

The theatrical provenance is unknown. Although F.G. Fleay stated that the play belonged to the King's Men in 1622-5 (2:207), he offered no evidence (see Bentley 5:1024-5).


Probable Genre(s)

Comedy.


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

Although Rowley was payee for a court performance of a two-part play entitled The Knaves in 1613, there is no evidence that he wrote it, and Bentley thus states that "there is no adequate reason" to connect The Knaves with A Knave in Print (5:1024).


References to the Play

None known.


Critical Commentary

Bentley (5:1025) notes that Moseley's list contains a number of instances in which plays with alternative titles are in fact a "fraudulent entry of two different plays as one". He suggests therefore that One for Another may be a different play from A Knave in Print.


For What It's Worth




Works Cited

  • Fleay, F.G., A Biographical Chronicle of the English Drama, 2 vols. (London: Reeves and Turner, 1891)




Site created and maintained by David Nicol, Dalhousie University; updated 15 July 2010.