King and the Subject: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Massinger, Philip]] ([[Year]])
[[Massinger, Philip]] ([[1638])




==Historical Records==
==Historical Records==


<Reproduce relevant documentary evidence from historical records here. (For example, entries from Henslowe's Diary).>
===Office of the Revels===
 
On 5 June 1638, Sir Henry Herbert entered a substantial memorandum on "The King and the Subject." It included a 7-line quotation from the play:
 
:Monys? Wee’le rayse supplies what ways we please,<br>
:And force you to subscribe to blanks, in which<br>
:We’le mulct you as wee shall thinke fitt. The Caesars<br>
:In Rome were wise, acknowledginge no lawes<br>
:But what their swords did ratifye, the wives<br>
:And daughters of the senators bowinge to<br>
:Their wills, as dieties, &c.'<br>
 
 
It also included a background story on the play and the excerpt:
 
<blockquote>This is a peece taken out of Philip Massingers play, called The King and the Subject, and entered here for ever to bee remembered by my son and those that cast their eyes on it, in honour of Kinge Charles, my master, who, readinge over the play at Newmarket, set his marke upon the place with his owne hande, and in thes words:
 
::::This is too insolent, and to bee changed.
 
Note, that the poett makes it the speech of a king, Don Pedro king of Spayne, and spoken to his subjects.</blockquote>




Line 55: Line 74:
Site created and maintained by [[William Proctor Williams]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.
Site created and maintained by [[William Proctor Williams]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.
[[category:all]][[category:your name]]
[[category:all]][[category:your name]]
Sir Henry Herbert’s memorandum on the play:
“'Monys? Wee’le rayse supplies what ways we please,
And force you to subscribe to blanks, in which
We’le mulct you as wee shall thinke fitt. The Caesars
In Rome were wise, acknowledginge no lawes
But what their swords did ratifye, the wives
And daughters of the senators bowinge to
Their wills, as dieties, &c.'
This is a peece taken out of Philip Massingers play, called The King and the Subject, and entered here for ever to bee remembered by my son and those that cast their eyes on it, in honour of Kinge Charles, my master, who, readinge over the play at Newmarket, set his marke upon the place with his owne hande, and in thes words: This is too insolent, and to bee changed.  Note, that the poett makes it the speech of a king, Don Pedro king of Spayne, and spoken to his subjects.”

Revision as of 11:41, 2 March 2013

Massinger, Philip ([[1638])


Historical Records

Office of the Revels

On 5 June 1638, Sir Henry Herbert entered a substantial memorandum on "The King and the Subject." It included a 7-line quotation from the play:

Monys? Wee’le rayse supplies what ways we please,
And force you to subscribe to blanks, in which
We’le mulct you as wee shall thinke fitt. The Caesars
In Rome were wise, acknowledginge no lawes
But what their swords did ratifye, the wives
And daughters of the senators bowinge to
Their wills, as dieties, &c.'


It also included a background story on the play and the excerpt:

This is a peece taken out of Philip Massingers play, called The King and the Subject, and entered here for ever to bee remembered by my son and those that cast their eyes on it, in honour of Kinge Charles, my master, who, readinge over the play at Newmarket, set his marke upon the place with his owne hande, and in thes words:

This is too insolent, and to bee changed.

Note, that the poett makes it the speech of a king, Don Pedro king of Spayne, and spoken to his subjects.


Theatrical Provenance

<Enter information about which company performed the play, and where/when it was performed, etc.>


Probable Genre(s)

<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>


References to the Play

<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>


Critical Commentary

<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>


For What It's Worth

<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>


Works Cited


Bawcutt, N. W., ed. Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels, 1623-73. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. item 386a, pp. 203-04 (Herbert).


<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>


Site created and maintained by William Proctor Williams, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.