French Doctor: Difference between revisions

m (converted one bit to lpd-pre)
Line 11: Line 11:
<br>
<br>


:{| {{table}}
 
| y<sup>e</sup> 18 of octobʒ 1594||||||||||||||||||R''es'' at the frenshe docter||||||||||||||||||xxij<sup>s</sup>
<lpd-pre>
|}
::y<sup>e</sup> 18 of octobʒ 1594     R''es'' at the frenshe docter     xxij<sup>s</sup></lpd-pre>
 


<br><br>
<br><br>

Revision as of 12:23, 15 June 2019

Anon. (1594)Property "Documentary Source" (as page type) with input value "{{{documentarySources}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Paratext" (as page type) with input value "{{{paratexts}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Contributor" (as page type) with input value "{{{contributors}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Partnering Institution" (as page type) with input value "{{{partneringInstitutions}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.

Historical Records

Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)


F. 10 (Greg I, 19)


          ye 18 of octobʒ 1594     Res at the frenshe docter     xxijs




F. 10v (Greg, I.19)

ye 28 of octobʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter . . . . . . . . . xvs
ye 18 of novmbʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter . . . . . . . . . xxvijs

Theatrical Provenance

The theatrical provenance of "French Doctor" is complicated by the fact that Henslowe did not mark the play "ne" at its debut in his records for the autumn of 1594. Theater historians consequently assume that the play was in revival. But where had it been when new, and with which company?

Probable Genre(s)

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

References to the Play

Critical Commentary

For What It's Worth

Works Cited