Payments to Playwrights (Henslowe’s Diary)
F. 107v (Greg I.170)
Lent vnto vmfrey Jeaffes the 9 of septmbʒ } 1602 in pt of payment vnto mr Roben } sone for a tragedie called felmelanco } iijli the some of . . . . . . . . }
Lent vnto Thomas downton the 15 of septmbʒ } 1602 to paye vnto harey chettell in pte } of payment for his tragedie of felmelanco } xs the some of . . . . . . . . }
pd at the a poyntment of thomas downton } to harey chettell in fulle payment of } his tragedie called felmelanco some of } ls
Purchased for the Admiral's men at the Fortune.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
The enigmatic title has spawned some desperate conjecture from critics, but none have proved particularly satisfactory.
References to the Play
Fleay misread the title as "Femelanco". He doubts the existence of Henslowe's "Mr Robinson" as co-author: "Robinson was, I think, to Chettle what Mrs. Harris was to Mrs. Gamp" (Harris being a product of Gamp's imagination in Dickens' Martin Chuzzlewit) (BCED 1.70).
Hazlitt followed Fleay's misreading of the title and interpreted it as "The Female Anchoress" and entered the play under that name (Manual 84)
Greg (2.224) thought the title should perhaps be "Fell Melanco" but decline to explain what he thought that meant. He thinks it is unlikely that Robinson "had any hand in the play" but denies that he is a "fictitious character" (as Fleay thought); Greg preferred to think Chettle had again pawned a play (see Greg #258) and Robinson was involved in the financial transaction.
Wiggins (#1354) surveys the various suggestions for interpreting the title (noting the "especial desperation" of The Female Anchoress, with its "redundant adjective"). With "equal lack of conviction", he raises the possibility of "a deaf or confused Henslowe mangling the word calamanco (meaning a type of fine chequered cloth)" or the possibility of "the title as the worn-down remnants of Philip the Melancholy" (but dismisses this possibility on the grounds that Henslowe "would then have bought the play twice over" within the space of about a month). The "nearest long-shot" he offers is Philomela, which he notes "fails to account for the last three letters". Wiggins concludes that "'Felmelanco' might just as well be an invented proper name, and therefore unlikely to be traceable".
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>
Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 01 June 2017.