Famous Wars of Henry I and the Prince of Wales: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
==Theatrical Provenance==
==Theatrical Provenance==


<Enter information about which company performed the play, and where/when it was performed, etc.>






==Probable Genre(s)==
==Probable Genre(s)==
<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>




==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>




Line 54: Line 49:
==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==


<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>




Line 60: Line 54:
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
<br>
 
Greg assumed that the play addressed the conflicts of Henry I with either Gruffydd ab Rhys, Prince of South Wales, or Gruffydd ab Cynan, Prince of North Wales ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary02hensuoft#page/190/mode/2up II.191-2, #130]). He was inclined to follow '''Fleay's''' lead




Line 66: Line 62:
==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>




Line 72: Line 67:
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==


<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>


<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>




Site created and maintained by [[your name]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.
Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.
[[category:all]][[category:your name]]
[[category:all]][[category:your name]]

Revision as of 11:50, 25 May 2016

  • Bulleted list item

Henry Chettle, Thomas Dekker, and Michael Drayton (1598)


Historical Records

Payments to Playwrights (Henslowe's Diary)


F. 45 (Greg, I.85)

Lent vnto drayton & cheattell the 13 of marche 1598
in parte payments of a boocke wher in is a parte of
a weallche man written wch they have promysed to delyuer
by the xx day next followinge J saye lent R money ............. } xxxxs


lent vnto the company to paye drayton & dyckers
& chetell ther full payment for the boocke called
the famos wares of henry the first & the prynce
of walles the some of ........................................ } iiili vs


Payments, Miscellaneous (Henslowe's Diary)


F. 45 (Greg, I.85)

lent at that tyme vnto the company for to spend
at the Readynge of that boocke at the sonne in
new fyshstreate ................................................. } vs



Theatrical Provenance

Probable Genre(s)

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

References to the Play

Critical Commentary


Greg assumed that the play addressed the conflicts of Henry I with either Gruffydd ab Rhys, Prince of South Wales, or Gruffydd ab Cynan, Prince of North Wales (II.191-2, #130). He was inclined to follow Fleay's lead


For What It's Worth

Works Cited

Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.