Difference between revisions of "Dido"
|Line 78:||Line 78:|
==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==
Revision as of 11:33, 17 October 2019
Payments, Miscellaneous (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 44 (Greg I, 83)
Layd [of] owte for copr lace for the littell boye & for a valle for the boye a} geanste the playe of dido & enevs the 3 of Jenewary 1597 } xxixs
- Lent vnto the company when they fyrst played}
- dido at nyght the some of thirtishillynges}
- wch wasse the 8 of Jenewary 1597 J saye… } xxxs
Henslowe's Inventories of Properties and Apparel
Greg, Papers, Apx. I, 1.116
The Enventary tacken of all the properties for my Lord Admeralles men, the 10 of Marche 1598.
- Item, j tome of Guido, j tome of Dido, j bedsteade.
Greg, Papers, Apx. I. 1.118, 120
The Enventorey of all the aparell of the Lord Admeralles men, taken the 13th of Marche 1598, as followeth:
- Item, Dides robe.
The Admiral's men had "Dido" in production by 8 January 1598, apparently its debut performance (or perhaps its first performance) "at nyght" (Greg I, 83). Gurr conjectures that the evening performance was "for a private event, not at the Rose" (231, n.74). Menzer takes Henslowe's entry as accurate, deducing from it that professional men's companies did under certain circumstances perform in London at night (citation? SQ?).
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Virgil's Aeneid is the only source a playwright would need, though there were previous dramatic versions with which he might have been familiar, the most obvious being that by Christopher Marlowe (and in some way also Thomas Nashe) published in 1594.
References to the Play
None known to this play specifically.
Marlowe and Nashe's play?
Scholars have differed in assessing the likelihood of whether the Admiral's play may have represented some form of Dido, Queen of Carthage by Marlowe and Nashe (printed 1594). Collier suggested it was "[p]erhaps some alteration and revival of Marlowe and Nash's 'Dido, Queen of Carthage,' printed in 1594' but allowed that "it might, however, be a new production on the same subject" (117, n.3). Fleay, BCED found the identification with Marlowe and Nashe's play "doubtful" given the absence of any evidence for the Admiral's acquisition of it (II.148, 306). Greg agreed, noting that the tomb listed in the Admiral's inventory of properties does not appear in the Marlovian play (Papers, 116n). Nonetheless, the inclination to lump this play with Marlowe's persisted. Gurr considered it "[m]ost likely" that this "Dido" was a revival "if the theory that almost all of Marlowe's plays went to the company [Admiral's] in 1594 has any value" (231, n.74).
Having dismissed Marlowe and Nashe as authors of the Admiral's "Dido", Fleay proposed Jonson: "on 3rd Dec. 1597 there is an entry of a plot of a play by Jonson to be delivered at Christmas, and this Dido apparently was delivered at Christmas; certainly no other play by Jonson was so" (II.306-7). He went on to propose that this may have been the source of the Dido and Aeneas play in Shakespeare's Hamlet, described as "caviare to the general" and "never acted above once." Greg rejected Fleay's hypothesis, finding it difficult to imagine the characteristically slow Jonson moving from plot to completion by 8 January, moreover without publishing the finished play (II.189-90).
Pembroke's Men's play?
Greg found the most likely possibility for the play's provenance that it was "an old play brought in by Pembroke's Men" (Greg II.190).
For What It's Worth
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, UA-Little Rock; updated 15 October 2019.