Noble Trial: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
(20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Henry Glapthorne]] ( | [[Henry Glapthorne]] (c.[[1633]]-[[1642]]) | ||
==Historical Records== | ==Historical Records== | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===[[Marriott's List (1653)]]=== | ===[[Marriott's List (1653)]]=== | ||
Among the twenty-one plays entered on the Stationer's Register by Marriott in 1653 is listed: | Among the twenty-one plays entered on the Stationer's Register by the printer John Marriott in 1653 is listed: | ||
:The Law Case | :The Law Case | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:The Noble Triall | :The Noble Triall | ||
:::(Bentley, 5.1445) | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
===Stationers' Register=== | ===Stationers' Register=== | ||
On 29 June | On 29 June 1660, the printer Humphrey Moseley entered on the Stationers' Register a list of twenty-six plays, including: <br> | ||
:The Vestall. a Tragedy. } | |||
:The noble Triall. a Tragicomedy } by Hen: Glapthorne. | |||
:The Dutchesse of Fernandina. a Tragedy } | |||
<br> | |||
:(SR2, 2.271, [http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/collections/cul/texts/ldpd_6177199_002/pages/ldpd_6177199_002_00000279.html CLIO]) | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
===[[Warburton's List]]=== | |||
"The Noble Tryall. T. H. Glapthorn" is listed among the manuscript plays which Warburton claimed had been destroyed by his cook:<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<!--newThumb-->[[Image:Lansdowne_ms_807_f001r.jpg|250px]]<!--/newThumb--> | |||
<br> | |||
:(British Library, Lansdowne MS 807, fo.1<sup>r</sup>. Reproduced by permission of the British Library. Click image to view full page; [[Warburton's List|'''click here for more information on Warburton's list''']]) | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br>[[category:British Library]] | |||
==Theatrical provenance== | |||
Unknown. Glapthorne is known to have been active throughout the 1630s, for a range of different dramatic companies (see below). The date range given above is from Harbage. Some online sources ascribe the play to the year 1635: this date seems to have arisen originally from Fleay's identification of the play with ''The Lady Mother'' (see below) rather than from any independent source of evidence, even though it is now often repeated as fact. | |||
==Probable genres== | |||
Tragicomedy according to Moseley. "T", i.e. tragedy, in Warburton's list: but see discussion. | |||
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues== | |||
None known | |||
== | ==References to the Play== | ||
None known | |||
==Critical Commentary== | ==Critical Commentary== | ||
The three lists in which this play occurs are all problematic. Marriott's list of twenty-one plays, eighteen of them now lost, is transcribed and discussed '''[[Marriott's List (1653)|here]]'''. Similarly, "Moseley's entire entry of 29 June 1660 is a curious one", comments Bentley, observing that most of the plays on that, too, have disappeared. Thirdly, there is Warburton's list. | The three lists in which this play occurs are all problematic. Marriott's list of twenty-one plays, eighteen of them now lost, is transcribed and discussed '''[[Marriott's List (1653)|here]]'''. Similarly, "Moseley's entire entry of 29 June 1660 is a curious one", comments Bentley, observing that most of the plays on that, too, have disappeared. Thirdly, there is Warburton's list. W. W. Greg has argued that Warburton's list seems to be derived from Stationers' Register records, and cannot really be regarded as possessing an independent authority. Hence, its description of ''The Noble Trial'' as tragedy rather than tragicomedy does not carry much weight. Conversely, John Freehafer has made the case that there is some independent authority to Warburton's list. (Greg, "Bakings of Betsy"; see also [[Warburton's List]]). | ||
Henry Glapthorne is one of the unsung journeymen of Caroline drama. His six surviving plays include comedy, tragicomedy, and the tragedy ''[[Parricide, The / Revenge for Honour|Revenge for Honour/The Parricide]]''; his playwriting career seems to have extended from around 1630 to around 1640, and to have involved a range of companies including the King's Men, Queen Henrietta's Men, and Beeston's Boys. His surviving work tends towards the derivative and repetitive, but that does not make it uninteresting: indeed, Julie Sanders comments that "Glapthorne's plays have slipped from notice but they remain strong examples of Caroline drama and of the age's sensibility and taste." | |||
Fleay (''BCED'', 1.244) speculated that ''The Noble Trial'' was an otherwise unattested alternative title for Glapthorne's ''The Lady Mother''. This suggestion has been universally rejected as baseless (e.g. Bentley, 4.488) but (as noted above) it persists indirectly insofar as it has led to ''The Noble Trial'' often being ascribed to the year 1635. J. Q. Adams noted that Glapthorne is also credited with a lost play with a rather similar title: ''The [[Noble Husbands]]'', which appears on [[Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript]]. Tentatively, Adams raised the possibility of a connection between these two similar titles (Adams, "Hill's List", 95). Bentley (5.1446) also noted the similarity between this title and that of Ford's 1638 comedy ''The Lady's Trial''. | |||
==For what it's worth== | ==For what it's worth== | ||
EEBO-TCP currently contains seventeen examples of the phrase "noble trial", the nature of the trials involved ranging from the spiritual to the purely legal. Perhaps more investigation of those examples might help constrain further the likely contents of this lost play. | EEBO-TCP currently contains seventeen examples of the phrase "noble trial", the nature of the trials involved ranging from the spiritual to the purely legal. Perhaps more investigation of those examples might help constrain further the likely contents of this lost play. | ||
==Works Cited== | ==Works Cited== | ||
Greg, W. W. “The Bakings of Betsy.” The Library, 3rd series. 7.11 (1911): 225-259. Print. <br> | Adams, Joseph Quincy. “Hill’s List of Early Plays in Manuscript.” ''The Library'' 4th Ser., 20.1 (1939): 71-99. Print.<br> | ||
Sanders, Julie. ‘Glapthorne, Henry (bap. 1610)’, | Freehafer, John. "John Warburton's Lost Plays", ''Studies in Bibliography'' (1970) 154-164. <br> | ||
Greg, W. W. “The Bakings of Betsy.” ''The Library'', 3rd series. 7.11 (1911): 225-259. Print. <br> | |||
Sanders, Julie. ‘Glapthorne, Henry (bap. 1610)’, [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/10796 ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography''], Oxford University Press, 2004. | |||
[[ | [[category:all]] | ||
[[Category:Unknown]] | [[Category:Unknown]][[category:Matthew Steggle]] | ||
[[Category:Marriott's List]] | [[Category:Marriott's List]] | ||
[[Category:Warburton's List]] | [[Category:Warburton's List]] | ||
[[Category:Noble...]] | [[Category:Noble...]] | ||
[[category:Stationers' Register]] | |||
Page created and maintained by [[Matthew Steggle]], Sheffield Hallam University. Revised | <br> | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
Page created and maintained by [[Matthew Steggle]], Sheffield Hallam University. Revised 7 February 2012. |
Latest revision as of 15:50, 10 December 2021
Henry Glapthorne (c.1633-1642)
Historical Records
Marriott's List (1653)
Among the twenty-one plays entered on the Stationer's Register by the printer John Marriott in 1653 is listed:
- The Law Case
- The Younger Brother
- The Noble Triall
- (Bentley, 5.1445)
Stationers' Register
On 29 June 1660, the printer Humphrey Moseley entered on the Stationers' Register a list of twenty-six plays, including:
- The Vestall. a Tragedy. }
- The noble Triall. a Tragicomedy } by Hen: Glapthorne.
- The Dutchesse of Fernandina. a Tragedy }
- (SR2, 2.271, CLIO)
Warburton's List
"The Noble Tryall. T. H. Glapthorn" is listed among the manuscript plays which Warburton claimed had been destroyed by his cook:
- (British Library, Lansdowne MS 807, fo.1r. Reproduced by permission of the British Library. Click image to view full page; click here for more information on Warburton's list)
Theatrical provenance
Unknown. Glapthorne is known to have been active throughout the 1630s, for a range of different dramatic companies (see below). The date range given above is from Harbage. Some online sources ascribe the play to the year 1635: this date seems to have arisen originally from Fleay's identification of the play with The Lady Mother (see below) rather than from any independent source of evidence, even though it is now often repeated as fact.
Probable genres
Tragicomedy according to Moseley. "T", i.e. tragedy, in Warburton's list: but see discussion.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known
References to the Play
None known
Critical Commentary
The three lists in which this play occurs are all problematic. Marriott's list of twenty-one plays, eighteen of them now lost, is transcribed and discussed here. Similarly, "Moseley's entire entry of 29 June 1660 is a curious one", comments Bentley, observing that most of the plays on that, too, have disappeared. Thirdly, there is Warburton's list. W. W. Greg has argued that Warburton's list seems to be derived from Stationers' Register records, and cannot really be regarded as possessing an independent authority. Hence, its description of The Noble Trial as tragedy rather than tragicomedy does not carry much weight. Conversely, John Freehafer has made the case that there is some independent authority to Warburton's list. (Greg, "Bakings of Betsy"; see also Warburton's List).
Henry Glapthorne is one of the unsung journeymen of Caroline drama. His six surviving plays include comedy, tragicomedy, and the tragedy Revenge for Honour/The Parricide; his playwriting career seems to have extended from around 1630 to around 1640, and to have involved a range of companies including the King's Men, Queen Henrietta's Men, and Beeston's Boys. His surviving work tends towards the derivative and repetitive, but that does not make it uninteresting: indeed, Julie Sanders comments that "Glapthorne's plays have slipped from notice but they remain strong examples of Caroline drama and of the age's sensibility and taste."
Fleay (BCED, 1.244) speculated that The Noble Trial was an otherwise unattested alternative title for Glapthorne's The Lady Mother. This suggestion has been universally rejected as baseless (e.g. Bentley, 4.488) but (as noted above) it persists indirectly insofar as it has led to The Noble Trial often being ascribed to the year 1635. J. Q. Adams noted that Glapthorne is also credited with a lost play with a rather similar title: The Noble Husbands, which appears on Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript. Tentatively, Adams raised the possibility of a connection between these two similar titles (Adams, "Hill's List", 95). Bentley (5.1446) also noted the similarity between this title and that of Ford's 1638 comedy The Lady's Trial.
For what it's worth
EEBO-TCP currently contains seventeen examples of the phrase "noble trial", the nature of the trials involved ranging from the spiritual to the purely legal. Perhaps more investigation of those examples might help constrain further the likely contents of this lost play.
Works Cited
Adams, Joseph Quincy. “Hill’s List of Early Plays in Manuscript.” The Library 4th Ser., 20.1 (1939): 71-99. Print.
Freehafer, John. "John Warburton's Lost Plays", Studies in Bibliography (1970) 154-164.
Greg, W. W. “The Bakings of Betsy.” The Library, 3rd series. 7.11 (1911): 225-259. Print.
Sanders, Julie. ‘Glapthorne, Henry (bap. 1610)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004.
Page created and maintained by Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam University. Revised 7 February 2012.